New Facebook whistleblower claims execs downplayed Russian interference, hate speech: report


You Might Also Like

– Advertisement –

These claims purportedly confirm a number of recent allegations made by another former Facebook employee, Frances Haugen.

– Advertisement –

A new whistleblower has emerged with allegations that Facebook executives prioritized profit over their efforts to curb the spread of hate speech and misinformation on the social media platform, according to a report Friday.

The whistleblowers, identified as former Facebook employees and members of the company’s Integrity division, made the allegations in an affidavit to the Securities and Exchange Commission. Washington Post informed of.


The claims by Frances Haugen, another former Facebook employee who testified damagingly about the company’s practices on Capitol Hill earlier this month, reportedly corroborated several recent allegations.

Whistleblower Frances Hogan, Facebook monitoring board will meet ‘in the coming week’

– Advertisement –

The new whistleblower said Facebook executives were often apathetic about public concerns about problematic content or were downplaying efforts to respond due to political blowback from then-President Donald Trump and concerns about damage to the company’s bottom line. Were.

The October 13 affidavit details a 2017 incident in which a Facebook communications executive dismissed concerns about public backlash about Russian interference in the 2016 election.

According to the whistleblower, Facebook communications officer Tucker Bounds said, “It will be a flash in the pan. Some legislators will be outraged.” “And then in a few weeks they’ll move on to something else. In the meantime, we’re printing money in the basement, and we’re fine.”

The identity of the new whistleblower has not been publicly disclosed.

A Facebook representative condemned the report in a statement obtained by the Post.

Facebook spokeswoman Erin McPike said, “It is down to the Washington Post, which had fiercely competed with the New York Times during the past five years, to single out anecdotes in intensively reported, complex stories to its journalists.” on the number of sources searched for.” “It sets a dangerous precedent for hanging an entire story on a single source, making a slew of claims without any clear corroboration.”

The latest allegations came as Facebook was facing unprecedented criticism from lawmakers about its business practices. Internal Facebook documents detailed in media reports published by the Wall Street Journal and other outlets indicated that officials knew the platform was causing public harm.

Get Granthshala Business on the go by clicking here

The Journal’s series was based on documents provided by Haugen, who has called on Congress to regulate Facebook.

– Advertisement –

Related News

Next Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending News