The model accused him of groping her on the set of the music video, but the artist was previously sued for copyright infringement on the track.
Robin Thicke is in hot water once again for his 2013 hit “Blurred Lines.”
Model Emily Ratajkowski, who appeared in the music video for the song Thicke made with Pharrell Williams, accused Thicke of groping her on set. Ratajkowski revealed the allegations in her upcoming book, “My Body,” claiming that Thicke was intoxicated when he groped her breasts from behind.
“Suddenly, out of nowhere, I felt the coolness and exoticism of a stranger’s hands clutching my bare breasts from behind. I instinctively turned away, looking at Robin Thicke,” she wrote, published in a according to fraction The Sunday Times.
Thicke did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Granthshala News.
Emily Ratajkowski Tells Amy Schumer ‘It’s 40’ ‘Olding Isn’t OK’
The model’s allegation, while alarming, isn’t the first headache “Blurred Lines” has caused Thicke as it became a number 1 hit It remained on the Billboard Hot 100 chart for 13 weeks and sold six million copies. It’s unclear how much the hit single made Thicke, but we certainly have a good idea of what it’s worth. Although the song had its own pop music moment, one has to wonder if “Blurred Lines” was worth the trouble after a copyright infringement lawsuit costing Thicke and Williams millions of dollars and royalties.
This situation stems from claims made by the family of legendary 1970s singer Marvin Gaye, alleging that “Blurred Lines” had a sound and was similar to Gaye’s 1977 song “Got to Give It Up”. .
In response, Thicke, Pharrell Williams, and T.I., who also appeared on the track, filed a lawsuit in California federal court that same year, “Blurred Lines” was issued against Gay’s family and Bridgeport Music, for the song. Pre-emptive copyright protection was sought for. Hollywood Reporter It was noted at the time that while Thicke, Williams, and T.I. believed they had an affair, the makeup of the song was completely different.
He alleged that Gay’s family only felt that the two tracks “feel” or “sound” the same.
“Gay defendants are claiming ownership of an entire genre, as opposed to a specific act,” the lawsuit states.
Emily Ratajkowski shocked for holding baby in viral photo
For the next year and a half, the music world was paying close attention to the matter, wondering what the implications would be if “sound” and “feel” provided a sufficient legal basis for claiming copyright infringement. In 2015, the new York Times reported that a federal jury in Los Angeles had sided with Gaye’s family, forcing Williams and Pharrell to pay one of the highest copyright awards in music history.
The two appealed the decision, beginning a three-year legal tussle that resulted in the 9th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruling in favor of the Gay family by a 2–1 vote. Reuters.
The total that the Gay family had to pay the two cast members fell from about $7 million to about $5 million. However, Judge John Kronstadt ordered that future royalties from “Blurred Lines” also go to Gay. FFriendly.
According to Board, Thicke, Williams and Williams’s More Water from Nazareth Publishing Inc. was ordered to pay $2,848,847 in damages. Thicke was ordered to pay an additional $1,768,192, and Williams and his publishing company were ordered to pay a further $357,631. After determining that his brief appearance on the track would not rise to the level of plagiarism, TI was off the hook.
In addition to costing Thicke and Williams a penny, the court’s decisions put the entire industry on notice. As Forbes Note, artists should now be extra cautious about songs or beat creations. The Gay case set a precedent by which only songs inspired by another artist could open an artist to potential plagiarism lawsuit.