COVID-19 mandate: New York judge temporarily blocks medical worker directive

319
SHARES
2.5k
VIEWS

You Might Also Like


– Advertisement –


The regime temporarily barred the state from forcing medical workers to vaccinate after healthcare workers sued them for violating constitutional rights

– Advertisement –

UTICA, NY — A federal judge on Tuesday temporarily blocked New York state from forcing medical workers to vaccinate after a group of health care workers filed a lawsuit, saying it violated their constitutional rights. was done because the state mandate rejected religious exemptions.

Judge David Hurd in Utica issued the order after 17 health professionals, including doctors and nurses, claimed in a lawsuit Monday that their rights had been violated with a vaccine mandate that denied exemptions.

advertisement

The judge gave the state of New York until September 22 to respond to the lawsuit in federal court in Utica. If the state opposes plaintiffs’ request for a preliminary court order blocking the vaccine mandate, an oral hearing will take place on September 28.

Candace backs Nicki Minaj for standing up for liberal media, politics: She’s ‘not playing that game’

– Advertisement –

The state issued the order on August 28, requiring at least the first pill for health care workers in hospitals and nursing homes by September 27.

New York Gov. Press Secretary Hazel Crampton-Hayes, a Democrat, Kathy Hochul, said in a statement that the state was considering all legal options.

Crampton-Hayes said, “Governor Hochul is doing everything in his power to protect New Yorkers and combat the delta variant by increasing vaccine rates across the state. Health care workers need to be vaccinated to fight this.” is important.”

Messages seeking comment were also sent to the lawyers of the Thomas More Society, which filed the suit.

Dr. Joseph R., President of the Medical Society of the State of New York. Sellers said in a statement that the non-profit organization for physicians, residents and medical students is “deeply disappointed by today’s decision.”

Sellers said, “We believe this move will result in a flurry of efforts to circumvent the well-intentioned vaccination requirement, a move toward reversing the recent surge caused by more easily spread delta variants.” It was an important step.” “No major religious denomination opposes vaccination, and the Supreme Court has upheld vaccination requirements for more than 100 years as a means of protecting public health.”

Arizona sues Biden administration over COVID-19 vaccine mandate

In their lawsuit, health care professionals hid their identities with pseudonyms such as “Dr A,” “Nurse A,” and “Physician Liaison X.”

He cited violations of the New York state human rights law and the New York City human rights law, as well as the U.S. Constitution, as the state’s health department requiring workers to receive the vaccine “with no exemptions for conscientious religious beliefs that deny force to do”. of such vaccinations.”

Court papers state that all available vaccines employ aborted embryonic cell lines in their testing, development or production. But religious leaders disagreed on the issue, and the Vatican issued a statement last year saying vaccines are “ethically acceptable.”

The lawsuit states that the plaintiffs wanted to proceed anonymously because they “run the risk of being humiliated, threats of harm, immediate firing and other retaliatory consequences if their names become known.”

The lawsuit states that the plaintiffs, all Christians, included contact with a practicing doctor, nurse, a nuclear medicine technologist, a cognitive rehabilitation therapist, and a physician, all of whom would, in the case of religious belief, have no medical association in abortion. oppose.

It states that they are not “anti-vaxxers” who oppose all vaccines.


– Advertisement –

Related News

Next Post

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Trending News